09-05-2008, 05:19 PM
nplenzick wrote:
Do you think I would post something without reading it first?
I'm a scientist - for me it's all about acquisition of unbiased data. Emotion doesn't come into any decision I make - it's all about data and logic.
Several assessments that I've seen peg the candidates as follows for their pro-science votes:
Obama - 50%
McCain - 30%
Biden - 35%
None of them are ideal when it comes to being guided by data and science.
Quote:Wellardmac wrote:Quote:Review on the science positions of the candidates. Palin has not yet been vetted, but it's not going to be pretty.The first link above is excellent! Unbiased information. If science is important to you read it and pick your candidate!
http://sharp.sefora.org/innovation2008/mccain-obama/
http://sefora.org/2008/08/22/obama-picks...n-science/
Do you think I would post something without reading it first?

I'm a scientist - for me it's all about acquisition of unbiased data. Emotion doesn't come into any decision I make - it's all about data and logic.

Several assessments that I've seen peg the candidates as follows for their pro-science votes:
Obama - 50%
McCain - 30%
Biden - 35%
None of them are ideal when it comes to being guided by data and science.
Well 'ard: British Slang. Very Tough. Very Good.
Life is too short to travel in the slow lane.
Life is too short to travel in the slow lane.