06-04-2009, 03:52 PM
Mike brings up an interesting point re: liability. However, how certain would an attorney be of proving negligence? We all agree to go chasing/racing understanding that none of us are professionals. Absent an obvious error or blatant disregard of the rules, how could one driver be considered negligent and the other not?
I remember a case where 2 yoots (sorry, your honor, yoouuthes) got in a fight after a hockey game in NY. Each went to his car in the lot, retreived his weapon of choice (brass knuckles vs. nun-chuks) and went at it. One died. In civil court, the judge declared no harm/no foul as both men agreed to fight.
Fortunately, DE is quite safe except for equipment failures, and we all do diligent tech inspections, so negligence is ? All said, I still would not want to be named in a suit.
Where's the pie?
I remember a case where 2 yoots (sorry, your honor, yoouuthes) got in a fight after a hockey game in NY. Each went to his car in the lot, retreived his weapon of choice (brass knuckles vs. nun-chuks) and went at it. One died. In civil court, the judge declared no harm/no foul as both men agreed to fight.
Fortunately, DE is quite safe except for equipment failures, and we all do diligent tech inspections, so negligence is ? All said, I still would not want to be named in a suit.
Where's the pie?
Ken Boyd
997 TT
GT3 Track car
930 Gone but not forgotten
997 TT
GT3 Track car
930 Gone but not forgotten
Driver's Education
Club Racing
Member List
RSS
Help