09-15-2009, 02:46 AM
Glen,
I don't doubt that there are a few people that would rather run for free and have an extra student.
As I suggested earlier.... let's put together a series of suggestions and we'll look at them. With only two events left this year, and one of them this weekend, I don't think it's something we want to try to incorporate into this years program. So... let's see what ideas are out there and we can discuss them.
ninjabones wrote:
I don't doubt that there are a few people that would rather run for free and have an extra student.
As I suggested earlier.... let's put together a series of suggestions and we'll look at them. With only two events left this year, and one of them this weekend, I don't think it's something we want to try to incorporate into this years program. So... let's see what ideas are out there and we can discuss them.
ninjabones wrote:
Quote:Mike Andrews wrote:Quote:
Let me make a comment on your two students per instructor question. Our goal is to get back to one student per instructor. Two students (even when the instructor drives for free) is not fun.
Mike:
I'm not sure every instructor would agree with you (that is according to my unofficial poll of a few instructors this past week). It appears that having the option to select either one (at 1/2 price) or two students (free registration) was very appealing to them. Distributing the students proportionally to those more willing to have extra workload may help offset the current shortfall.
G
Michael Andrews