09-15-2009, 10:23 AM
emayer wrote:
Damn! Now I've added to the confusion. You're absolutely right -- and that's why I shouldn't have omitted the quote. I was indeed referring to the following, which I thought might have been serious (and now I'm still not sure, since it wasn't a statement from David):
"So basically for this year, our profit from our DE program which is our only profitable program paid for legal and accounting fees to figure out that $5000 was removed but later returned to the club.
"HMMM, paying $20,000 to recover $5,000. Our Executive Board is as efficient with our money as the federal government is."
Quote:David,
There may be some confusion here as I think Larry's comments were intended to the post prior to your (pretty funny!) response. I don't know who the author of the original statement was, and perhaps it was intended as a joke, but it didn't come across well. I hope it wasn't written to be taken seriously either for the reasons Larry pointed out.
Damn! Now I've added to the confusion. You're absolutely right -- and that's why I shouldn't have omitted the quote. I was indeed referring to the following, which I thought might have been serious (and now I'm still not sure, since it wasn't a statement from David):
"So basically for this year, our profit from our DE program which is our only profitable program paid for legal and accounting fees to figure out that $5000 was removed but later returned to the club.
"HMMM, paying $20,000 to recover $5,000. Our Executive Board is as efficient with our money as the federal government is."
'95 993