10-12-2009, 05:11 PM
Graham wrote:
Graham,
I agree, there's always room for improvement.
I also agree that our DE program is very good. And as you said, some of what makes it good could certainly be used in other RTR activities. I'd be honored to sit in on those other planning meetings and offer suggestions to make their program as successful as the track program, just let me know when you are having the next meeting.
Quote:JoeP wrote:Quote:Graham: I can understand that the President would want to get a peek inside the tent, but I still would like to know your feelings on track selection. If I care about one thing in this election, I care about DE events, and I am pretty happy with the status quo. However, some members and execs are questioning why speed council does not have more oversight.
Since the Board can change Bylaws or Policies at will, RTR could easily broaden exec involvement in the speed council. As a result, the President would have more direct or indirect input into track selection. Your campaign mailing makes that clear. It is fair for us to know which tracks you would like to drop or add - unless Track Chair and speed council responsibility will remain exactly as it is/was for the 2009 season.
Joe, had I been able to observe Speed Council deliberations I might have had some suggestions, and I might have some in the future, but only after I am better informed. Our DE program is very good but I'm sure even you and Mike would agree that it could be even better, and some of what makes it as good as it is could probably be adapted to other of RTR's activities. We're all looking to work as a team.
Graham,
I agree, there's always room for improvement.
I also agree that our DE program is very good. And as you said, some of what makes it good could certainly be used in other RTR activities. I'd be honored to sit in on those other planning meetings and offer suggestions to make their program as successful as the track program, just let me know when you are having the next meeting.
Michael Andrews