Financial Shakeup this weekend

[AMoore]

ccm911 wrote:

Now you've started it. Just like all Pro-Lifers, you automatically assume that Pro-Choice folks are not considering the unborn. There is a serious flaw in your argument. We are Pro-Choice, not Pro-Abortion.

We thinking folks realize that this is a very personal decision, and the government should have no say in what a woman chooses to do with her body. Let the individuals make the choices that are best for them.

The same should be done for recreational drug use, prostitution and gambling. These are personal choices, which should not be subject to government infingement.

By stating that you are pro-choice, and not pro-abortion, are you stating that you do not need to consider the unborn? I'm not sure where you have identified your position in this regard.

My position is that I would prefer that when somone states their pro-choice or pro-life opinion, they include their position with respect to whether the unborn have rights. This not not commonly done.

By the way, please completely read a posting before responding. I am not pro-life. I, quite simply, am not qualified to form such an opinion. You will notice that I made the same point as relating to both positions.

Moreover, Individuals are not free to "make choices that are best for them," if it is at the expense of other individuals. Certainly the government should have say as to how best protect the rights of individuals from the conduct of others.

It boils down to whether one believes that a fetus has rights. Again, I do not offer an opinion on this issue, but I prefer discouse that at least addresses this issue.