Pocono double infield course

[Mike Andrews]

[b][user=128]AMoore[/user] wrote:

I would guess that it would cost more to rent the double infield since it occupies more than one track. This could of course be offset by having more people attend since it is a bigger track.

Aaron - Yep, it costs more. Each of the tracks (three of them) brings in rental and you don't get much of a discount renting the whole track. And you are of course correct in that having more people would offset the cost. But we would need almost three times as many at the current cost structure.



[user=96]Terry[/user] wrote:

Mike, I know that it may have occurred to you before, and maybe there are insuperable reasons which would preclude it, but I don't know whether it has been looked at recently. We don't need to preempt the Pocono 500 but a weekday might be of interest to our members for something novel.

Terry - There aren't any reasons why not to do it, other than getting the track. That's why I wrote the tongue in cheek reply. And we have looked into the midweek event. The last time I checked the only dates they had were within a week or so of one of our other events and the group thought it might be a little tough to have two events so close to each other.[/b]



delanckc wrote:

I would definitely be interested in the double track and tri-oval configurations...

Three down and 197 more to go